There is an ancient and venerable principle of biblical exegesis which states that if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it must be a camel in disguise. So let’s apply that to whether or not Jesus was married. There is no evidence that Jesus was married (looks like a duck), multiple indications that he was not (walks like a duck), and no early texts suggesting wife or children (quacks like a duck)...so he must be an incognito bridegroom (camel in disguise). (John Dominic Crossan)
Gefunden in Darrell Bock, Breaking the Da Vinci Code
Ok, wir alle werden in diesen Tagen mal wieder ganz stark daran erinnert, wohin es – dank Jesus – nach links geht.
